Web Frontend / Fullstack
we leadTypeScript development
Default choice for production web apps, full-stack Next.js, React Server Components, Node / Bun / Deno, and any typed frontend system. If it compiles, it runs.
Sample projects we'd take
Next.js 15 + RSC customer portal
$25k–$60k · 5-8 weeks
Multi-tenant customer portal: auth (OIDC or magic-link), Stripe billing, Postgres, AI-assisted support workflows, role-based access. Edge-cached at CDN.
Type-safe SDK + OpenAPI integration layer
$8k–$20k · 2-3 weeks
Generate a fully type-safe TypeScript SDK from an existing Python / Go / Rails OpenAPI spec. Add retries, telemetry, mocking, and a CLI. Publish to npm.
React Native mobile MVP
$20k–$45k · 6-10 weeks
Expo + TypeScript cross-platform mobile MVP with shared business logic from your Next.js web app. Auth, offline sync, push, OTA updates.
Why TypeScript in 2026
TypeScript is the default choice for production web in 2026. The compiler catches more bugs than the test suite. Refactoring a 50k-line codebase becomes safe rather than terrifying. The React + Node + Bun + Deno ecosystem moves faster than any competitor and the talent pool is enormous. We default to TypeScript on every new web build unless there’s a specific reason not to (Python for AI orchestration, Go for high-concurrency services).
Honest caveats
TypeScript is overkill for a throwaway 50-line script — use plain JS or Bash. It’s also the wrong call for CPU-bound numerical work; offload to Python + NumPy or Rust / C++. The build pipeline (tsc, esbuild, swc, Vite, Turbopack, Next.js compiler) can sprawl if you’re not disciplined — we keep ours boring.
When to pick this · when not to
When to pick
Long-lived codebase, large team, refactoring-heavy domain.
When not to pick
Throwaway 50-line script or CPU-bound numerical work.
Different language?
If your project isn't a fit for TypeScript, we'll recommend the right one. Send the brief — we'll come back inside 48 hours with our honest pick.